Deviation and CAPA narratives
Draft and revise quality narratives against campaign data, prior deviations, and linked SOPs with citations you can inspect.
Product · Quality
Deviation narratives, CAPA, specs, and methods stay linked to source evidence so QA/QC teams spend time on judgment—not reconciling folders.
Draft and revise quality narratives against campaign data, prior deviations, and linked SOPs with citations you can inspect.
When a method or limit changes, Raycaster surfaces the quality docs and site records that must stay consistent.
Every staged edit keeps source context, so reviewers can explain what changed and why.
Public evidence
These runs stay in Biopharma—including misses, not only green scores. Open a trace to inspect the prompt, files, and rubric.
Evaluate promotional materials and supporting evidence for FDA promotional compliance—including fair balance, labeling consistency, and prohibited claim patterns—then produce a graded judgment with citations.
Failure mode · Off-label or unbalanced claim acceptance
GPT-5.5 · xhigh · Raycaster harness · public tier
Live public run · transcript · files · rubric
Inspect full run ↗Related
Looking for datasets or public runs from this kind of work? Start with evaluation data and published traces.