CAPABILITY · DOCUMENT REVIEW
AI document review,with the receipts.
Raycaster reads files of record the way a careful reviewer would. It flags gaps, conflicts, and missing requirements with citations back to the source—then proposes the change for a human to approve.
OLD WAY · NEW WAY
Review used to take days. The work itself is hours.
Document review is a job that scales with the page count. Raycaster removes the part that does not need a human.
Cross-referencing four windows at once
Old way
A reviewer cross-checks a PDF against specs, prior submissions, a spreadsheet of requirements, and an inbox of guidance. Issues live in a separate comment file. Findings get re-typed three times before anyone can act on them.
One workspace with cited findings
New way
Raycaster reads the document and the sources together. Findings land as comments on the page they belong to, each one linked to the clause it came from. The reviewer is doing review, not cross-referencing.
Reviewer decides, with audit trail
What you keep
The final call. Raycaster proposes; the reviewer accepts, edits, or rejects. Every decision lives on the document, with an audit trail of who approved what and why.
WHAT WE CHECK
The findings a careful reviewer would catch. In minutes.
Missing requirements
Items called out in the standards or specs that are not addressed in the document.
Outdated references
Citations to superseded standards, prior revisions, or guidance that no longer applies.
Inconsistent values
Numbers, limits, and parameters that conflict across sections or with the underlying data.
Unsupported claims
Statements that lack a source in the attached evidence, with the exact gap called out.
Cross-reference errors
Internal references that point to the wrong table, figure, section, or appendix.
Every finding includes the clause, the severity, and the proposed action. The reviewer verifies. No black box.
Four outputs. One review trail.
Comments on the page. A summary of issues by severity. Redlines staged as a diff. A timestamped record of who reviewed what. Everything stays attached to the document—nothing lives in a parallel chat or a separate report.
Built for teams whose stamp matters.
WHY NOT A CHAT-OVER-PDF TOOL
Files of record need more than a chat reply.
Three pieces of writing on why review work needs document-native infrastructure, not a generic chatbot.
Designed with regulatory, CMC, quality, and EPC reviewers who own the documents of record.
FAQ
Chat tools strip a file to plaintext and reply in a separate panel. Raycaster keeps the document as a document—tables, layout, citations, and all. Findings live on the page they belong to. Redlines stage as a diff against the file of record. The output is a reviewable file, not a paragraph.
Send us a document
you reviewed last week.
We will run a review live with your standards, your specs, and your team in the room. You see the findings, the citations, and the staged redlines.
Document review,
with the receipts.
Don’t miss out on Raycaster updates.
Products
Capabilities
Solutions
Resources
